← Back to Recently Funded

Recently Funded

Underwriting Case Study

London Refinance for Truck Driver Using Business Bank Statement Income

A couple in London, Ontario owned a residential property with two mortgages. The second mortgage carried a high interest rate of approximately 12%, and the clients also had additional debts. The husband worked as a truck driver, while the wife received disability income. Because the husband’s T1 income was low and the clients had credit challenges, they could not qualify for an A-lender refinance. HopeWell arranged a B-lender refinance using stated income supported by 12 months of business bank statements. The refinance consolidated the first mortgage, second mortgage, and additional debts, reducing monthly payments by approximately $2,000.

Details are anonymized to protect client, lender, investor, and transaction privacy. This case is for general education only and is not a commitment to lend, a guarantee of approval, or legal, tax, or financial advice.

1. Executive Summary

A couple in London, Ontario owned a residential property with two mortgages. The second mortgage carried a high interest rate of approximately 12%, and the clients also had additional debts. The husband worked as a truck driver, while the wife received disability income. Because the husband’s T1 income was low and the clients had credit challenges, they could not qualify for an A-lender refinance. HopeWell arranged a B-lender refinance using stated income supported by 12 months of business bank statements. The refinance consolidated the first mortgage, second mortgage, and additional debts, reducing monthly payments by approximately $2,000.

2. Borrower Profile

The borrowers were a couple in London, Ontario. The husband worked as a truck driver and had income that was better supported through business bank statement activity than through T1 income alone. The wife received disability income. The clients had some credit challenges. Their names, exact income, account details, credit scores, and lender details are not disclosed.

3. Property Profile

The property was an owner-occupied residential property in London, Ontario. The clients had two existing mortgages registered against the property. The second mortgage had a high interest rate of approximately 12%. Exact address, property value, mortgage balances, loan-to-value, and lender names are not disclosed.

4. The Challenge

The clients had credit challenges, limited verifiable income on T1s, two existing mortgages, and a high-interest second mortgage at approximately 12%. Their monthly obligations were high, and an A-lender refinance was not available because the income and credit profile did not fit standard institutional guidelines.

5. Why Conventional Solutions Failed

An A-lender refinance was not available because the clients did not fit standard income and credit guidelines. The husband’s verifiable income on T1s was too low for the required mortgage amount, and the credit issues added another layer of difficulty. A lender looking only at T1 income would not capture the cash-flow picture supported by business bank statement activity. At the same time, leaving the existing mortgage structure in place meant the clients remained burdened by a high-interest second mortgage and high monthly payments.

6. Our Analysis

HopeWell analyzed the file by reviewing the existing mortgage structure, second mortgage cost, additional debts, credit profile, disability income, T1 income, and 12 months of business bank statements. The core underwriting question was whether the borrower’s cash flow could reasonably support the refinance even though T1 income was not sufficient for A-lender approval. HopeWell also reviewed whether consolidating the high-interest second mortgage and other debts would materially improve monthly affordability. Since the file did not fit the A side, the appropriate lender category was a B lender that could consider stated income supported by bank statements.

7. Financing Structure

The file was structured as a B-lender refinance using stated income supported by 12 months of business bank statements. The new mortgage consolidated the existing first mortgage, the high-interest second mortgage, and additional debts. Public details do not disclose the exact mortgage amount, rate, lender name, property value, debt balances, or borrower identity.

8. Why the Solution Worked

The solution worked because the income documentation was matched to the correct lender category. The file did not fit A-lender T1-based qualification, but a B lender could consider stated income supported by business bank statements and the reasonability of the borrower’s occupation and cash flow. The refinance also reduced risk from a monthly-payment perspective because it replaced a high-interest second mortgage and other debts with a more manageable consolidated mortgage structure.

9. Key Lessons

  • Low T1 income does not always mean a borrower has no mortgage options, especially if bank statements support stronger cash flow.
  • Truck drivers and other self-employed or business-income borrowers may need a lender that understands non-standard income documentation.
  • A high-interest second mortgage can create significant monthly payment pressure.
  • B-lender refinancing may be appropriate when A-lender qualification is not available but the borrower has property equity and supportable cash flow.
  • The total monthly payment after consolidation can be more important than comparing one mortgage rate in isolation.
  • Stated income must still be reasonable, documented, and acceptable under lender policy.

10. Related HopeWell Resources

Suggested Diagrams

  • Before-and-after debt consolidation diagram showing first mortgage, 12% second mortgage, additional debts, and new B-lender refinance
  • Stated income documentation flow showing business bank statements, reasonability review, and lender qualification
  • Monthly payment reduction chart showing approximate $2,000 payment decrease
  • A-lender vs B-lender income review comparison for low T1 income borrowers

Real-world experience

Related underwriting case studies

Explore anonymized Ontario mortgage files that show how borrower circumstances, property details, lender policy, costs, and exit strategy can interact.

View all case studies →
Recently FundedLondon

London Builder Purchase Closed with Rush Alternative Bridge and B-Lender Stated-Income Exit

London clients were purchasing their primary residence from a builder. The husband was a truck driver with very low verifiable income, and the wife was not working. Before approaching us, they had spent a lot of time trying to get an A-lender approval, but they were declined because the income did not support the requested mortgage. When they came to us, only about five days were left before closing. The builder was demanding a very high penalty for extending the closing, even by a few days. We arranged a rush mortgage from an alternative lender strictly as a six-month bridge. We then arranged a mortgage from a B lender under a stated-income program supported by 12 months of bank statements.

Solution
Alternative lender bridge and B-lender stated-income mortgage
Purpose
Rush builder purchase closing using alternative-lender bridge followed by B-lender stated-income exit
London Ontariobuilder purchaserush closing
Read the case study
Recently FundedBrampton

Brampton Truck Driver Refinance from Private Mortgage to B Lender Using Bank Statements

Brampton clients were with a private lender. The husband was a truck driver, and the wife was salaried. The husband’s income declared on personal T1s was very low, which made traditional A-lender qualification difficult. We reviewed the file and recommended a full refinance with a B lender based on stated income supported by 12 months of bank statements. This allowed the clients to move away from private lending into a more suitable B-lender structure.

Solution
B-lender refinance
Purpose
B-lender refinance to exit private mortgage using stated income supported by 12 months of bank statements
Brampton Ontarioprivate mortgage exitB-lender refinance
Read the case study
Recently FundedLondon

London First-Time Buyer Approved with Two Jobs and Strong T4 Income

A 23-year-old first-time home buyer in London applied as a single applicant. She earned more than $125,000 annually while working two jobs. Although the income was strong, some lenders are cautious when a borrower relies on two jobs because they want to understand whether the income is stable and sustainable. HopeWell reviewed the income history and presented the file with a clear explanation that both jobs were in the same industry and supported by two years of T4s. The lender accepted the explanation and approved an insured mortgage.

Solution
Insured A-lender mortgage
Purpose
First-time home purchase
London Ontariofirst-time home buyeryoung borrower
Read the case study
Recently FundedPickering

Pickering Single Mother Qualified for Debt Consolidation Refinance Using Two Jobs, Bonuses, Commissions, Child Tax Benefits and Child Support

A single mother in Pickering wanted to consolidate debt through a full refinance. She worked two full-time jobs and also received bonuses and commissions. We used the average of her two-year T4 income where supported by lender policy. She also received child tax benefits and child support. Child support received can be used as income when properly documented and accepted by the lender; child support paid by a borrower is usually added to liabilities. In this case, because she was receiving support, it strengthened the income side of the file. When all eligible income sources were added together, the income was enough to qualify her for a full refinance.

Solution
Full mortgage refinance
Purpose
Full refinance for debt consolidation using complete income analysis
Pickering Ontariosingle motherdebt consolidation
Read the case study
Recently FundedBrampton

Brampton Dump Truck Company Owner Approved for B-Lender Second-Position HELOC Using Business Bank Statements

A Brampton client owned a dump truck company with more than 20 trucks. The business had very good cash flow, but he suddenly faced unexpected losses due to road accidents, legal issues, repair costs and maintenance expenses. Some trucks were not in working condition, but he still had to keep paying loan installments, insurance and other expenses. This created cash-flow pressure, and his credit score dropped because he had maxed out his credit cards. We recommended a B-lender HELOC in second position using stated income supported by 12 months of business bank statements.

Solution
B-lender second-position HELOC
Purpose
B-lender second-position HELOC using stated income supported by 12 months of business bank statements
Brampton Ontariodump truck companytransportation business
Read the case study
Recently FundedMarkham

Markham Private Mortgage Replaced with B-Lender Refinance for Self-Employed Owner-Operator Trucker

Markham clients were with a private lender and paying very high interest. Their monthly payments were upwards of $13,000 per month. The husband was a self-employed owner-operator trucker, and the wife was salaried. The credit score was low, so a full refinance from an A lender was not available. We reviewed 12 months of bank statements and recommended a full refinance from a B lender under a stated-income program. The refinance reduced monthly payments to approximately $7,000.

Solution
B-lender refinance
Purpose
B-lender full refinance to exit private mortgage using stated income supported by 12 months of bank statements
Markham Ontarioprivate mortgage exitB-lender refinance
Read the case study