← Back to Recently Funded

Recently Funded

Underwriting Case Study

Brantford Single Mother Approved by B Lender Using YTD Income Exception

A single mother in Brantford wanted to purchase her primary residence. She was making decent income through overtime and commissions even though her base salary was low. The challenge was that lenders usually use a two-year T4 average for overtime and commission income. Unfortunately, one year was affected by COVID-related work shutdowns, and the other year was affected by a road accident that prevented her from working as much as usual. As a result, the T4 average did not support the purchase. Her credit score was also low. We approached a B lender, explained the situation, provided the last 12 months of pay slips and bank statements, and asked the lender to consider an exception because her YTD income was strong. The lender accepted the explanation and approved the file on exception basis.

Details are anonymized to protect client, lender, investor, and transaction privacy. This case is for general education only and is not a commitment to lend, a guarantee of approval, or legal, tax, or financial advice.

1. Executive Summary

A single mother in Brantford wanted to purchase her primary residence. She was making decent income through overtime and commissions even though her base salary was low. The challenge was that lenders usually use a two-year T4 average for overtime and commission income. Unfortunately, one year was affected by COVID-related work shutdowns, and the other year was affected by a road accident that prevented her from working as much as usual. As a result, the T4 average did not support the purchase. Her credit score was also low. We approached a B lender, explained the situation, provided the last 12 months of pay slips and bank statements, and asked the lender to consider an exception because her YTD income was strong. The lender accepted the explanation and approved the file on exception basis.

2. Borrower Profile

The borrower was a single mother purchasing her primary residence in Brantford, Ontario. She had a low base salary but earned meaningful income through overtime and commissions. Her historical T4 income was distorted by COVID-related work shutdowns in one year and a road accident in another year. Her credit score was also on the lower side. Borrower identity, employer, income figures, credit score, accident details, and lender name are not disclosed.

3. Property Profile

The mortgage was for the purchase of an owner-occupied primary residence in Brantford, Ontario. Exact address, purchase price, down payment, mortgage amount, loan-to-value, rate, term, amortization, and lender name are not disclosed.

4. The Challenge

The client had a strong current income story, but the standard two-year T4 average did not reflect her actual earning capacity. Her overtime and commission income were important, but one historical year was affected by COVID shutdowns and another by a road accident. As a result, the two-year average looked too low. Her lower credit score added another layer of difficulty. The file needed a lender willing to look beyond the standard average and consider current documented income performance.

5. Why Conventional Solutions Failed

A standard A-lender approval was not viable because the two-year T4 average did not support the required income and the borrower’s credit score was low. The issue was not that the client had no income. The issue was that her normal earning pattern relied on overtime and commissions, while the two historical years used for averaging were affected by unusual events. If the lender only used the T4 average mechanically, the file would not work.

6. Our Analysis

Our analysis focused on whether the historical average accurately represented the borrower’s current ability to earn. The answer was no. One year was affected by COVID shutdowns, and another was affected by a road accident. Her current year-to-date income was much stronger and better reflected her current work pattern. We collected 12 months of pay slips and bank statements to show current income consistency and presented the file to a B lender with a clear exception request.

7. Financing Structure

The file was structured as a B-lender purchase mortgage. The lender reviewed the borrower’s current year-to-date income, last 12 months of pay slips, last 12 months of bank statements, historical T4s, credit profile, and explanation for the disrupted income years. Public details do not disclose the lender name, mortgage amount, rate, term, amortization, purchase price, down payment, income figures, or credit score.

8. Why the Solution Worked

The solution worked because the lender understood that the T4 average was not representative. The borrower had current documented income, and the reasons for the weak historical years were specific and explainable. The B lender accepted that explanation and approved the file on exception basis. The underwriting principle is that exceptions are strongest when the broker can clearly show why the standard calculation is misleading and provide documents supporting the current income reality.

9. Key Lessons

  • A low base salary does not always tell the full income story.
  • Overtime and commission income usually need a two-year history, but exceptions may be possible.
  • COVID shutdowns and accident-related time off can distort historical T4 averages.
  • Strong current YTD income can help if it is supported by pay slips and bank statements.
  • Lower credit score may move a file from A lending to B lending.
  • A B lender may approve on exception where the explanation is clear and the documentation is strong.
  • The broker’s job is to explain why the standard income calculation does not fairly represent the borrower’s current income.

10. Related HopeWell Resources

Suggested Diagrams

  • Income history timeline showing COVID shutdown year, road accident year, current strong YTD income, and B-lender exception approval
  • Overtime and commission income diagram showing base salary, overtime, commissions, T4 average, YTD income, and final lender decision
  • B-lender exception checklist showing pay slips, bank statements, T4s, explanation letter, credit review, and approval
  • A lender versus B lender decision tree showing low credit, weak T4 average, strong YTD income, exception request, and B-lender approval

Real-world experience

Related underwriting case studies

Explore anonymized Ontario mortgage files that show how borrower circumstances, property details, lender policy, costs, and exit strategy can interact.

View all case studies →
Recently FundedBrantford

Brantford A-Lender HELOC Using Corporate NIAT, Rental Surplus and Basement Rent Offset

Brantford clients co-owned three properties: a primary residence where the son lived with his parents, plus two rental properties. The primary residence was free and clear, and they wanted a HELOC secured against it. The husband worked as a truck driver, but his personal T1 income was very low because income was collected through a corporation account. We used corporate NIAT less dividends where lender policy allowed. The son was salaried, and the wife was also salaried. We also used the rental worksheet of a major A-side bank to calculate the rental position from the two rental properties. One rental property showed a surplus and one showed a deficit, but overall the rental worksheet showed a surplus. The subject property also had basement rental income, but lenders generally do not add the subject property to the rental worksheet; instead, the basement rent was treated as an offset. We approached a major A lender and secured the HELOC they needed.

Solution
A-lender HELOC
Purpose
A-lender HELOC on free-and-clear primary residence
Brantford OntarioA-lender HELOCfree and clear primary residence
Read the case study
Recently FundedHamilton

Hamilton Family Purchase Approved Using Stated Income and Rental Offset

A client wanted to purchase a home in Hamilton for her daughter and her daughter’s partner, both of whom were in school and not working. The mother already owned her own home and operated a cleaning business, but her T1 income was low because she wrote off much of her business income. Her husband worked seasonally, so his income needed to be averaged using T4s. We recommended a B-lender stated-income approach based on 12 months of business bank statements and also used basement rental income offsets from both properties where lender policy allowed. The file was approved.

Solution
B-lender stated-income mortgage
Purpose
Purchase for daughter and daughter’s partner
Hamilton Ontariofamily purchaseself-employed mortgage
Read the case study
Recently FundedLondon

London Builder Purchase Closed with Rush Alternative Bridge and B-Lender Stated-Income Exit

London clients were purchasing their primary residence from a builder. The husband was a truck driver with very low verifiable income, and the wife was not working. Before approaching us, they had spent a lot of time trying to get an A-lender approval, but they were declined because the income did not support the requested mortgage. When they came to us, only about five days were left before closing. The builder was demanding a very high penalty for extending the closing, even by a few days. We arranged a rush mortgage from an alternative lender strictly as a six-month bridge. We then arranged a mortgage from a B lender under a stated-income program supported by 12 months of bank statements.

Solution
Alternative lender bridge and B-lender stated-income mortgage
Purpose
Rush builder purchase closing using alternative-lender bridge followed by B-lender stated-income exit
London Ontariobuilder purchaserush closing
Read the case study
Recently FundedBrantford

Brantford B-Lender Exit Refinance Reduced Monthly Payments by Over $4,500

A single homeowner in Brantford was with a B lender and had a significant amount of credit card debt. His income was decent, and he had a rented basement, but his monthly obligations were still too high to sustain. The client’s main goal was to reduce monthly payments. We sat with him and reviewed the full debt profile. Instead of trying to consolidate everything without a strategy, we identified the debts that had to be included in the plan and prioritized debts with the highest monthly payment impact. By consolidating the right debts, the GDS/TDS ratios improved enough that we could request a minor exception from the bank. Overall, the client reduced his monthly payments by over $4,500.

Solution
Debt-consolidation refinance
Purpose
B-lender exit, debt consolidation, and monthly payment reduction
Brantford Ontariodebt consolidationB-lender exit
Read the case study
Recently FundedBrantford

Brantford New-to-Canada Insured Purchase with Complex Down Payment Tracing

A new-to-Canada couple was buying their first home in Canada in Brantford. The wife was salaried and had one job. The husband had two jobs: one full-time and one part-time. For the part-time job, we used the average of the previous year’s T4 income and current year-to-date income. The file was insured with 10% down. The bigger challenge was down payment verification. Their down payment was scattered across more than 10 accounts, with hundreds of internal transfers between their own accounts. When we collected three months of bank statements, the package ran into hundreds of pages. We prepared a clear executive summary for the underwriter and mapped every internal transfer between the clients’ own accounts.

Solution
Insured A-lender purchase mortgage
Purpose
Insured first-home purchase with 10% down and complex source-of-funds documentation
Brantford Ontarionew to Canadafirst home purchase
Read the case study
Recently FundedMarkham

Markham Self-Employed Trucker Approved with B-Lender Stated-Income Exception

A self-employed truck driver in Markham had incorporated only about one year earlier. Many lenders require at least two years of self-employment history, so the file was not suitable for an A-lender approval. However, before incorporating, the client had worked as a truck driver on payroll. We approached a B lender and requested an exception to the two-year self-employment rule. The rationale was that the client had not entered a new industry; he had moved from payroll trucking employment into incorporated trucking work. We supported the file with previous employer T4s and 12 months of business bank statements, and the lender reviewed the income under a stated-income approach.

Solution
B-lender stated-income mortgage
Purpose
Residential mortgage financing
Markham Ontarioself-employed truckertruck driver mortgage
Read the case study