← Back to Recently Funded

Recently Funded

Underwriting Case Study

London Builder Purchase Closed with Rush Alternative Bridge and B-Lender Stated-Income Exit

London clients were purchasing their primary residence from a builder. The husband was a truck driver with very low verifiable income, and the wife was not working. Before approaching us, they had spent a lot of time trying to get an A-lender approval, but they were declined because the income did not support the requested mortgage. When they came to us, only about five days were left before closing. The builder was demanding a very high penalty for extending the closing, even by a few days. We arranged a rush mortgage from an alternative lender strictly as a six-month bridge. We then arranged a mortgage from a B lender under a stated-income program supported by 12 months of bank statements.

Details are anonymized to protect client, lender, investor, and transaction privacy. This case is for general education only and is not a commitment to lend, a guarantee of approval, or legal, tax, or financial advice.

1. Executive Summary

London clients were purchasing their primary residence from a builder. The husband was a truck driver with very low verifiable income, and the wife was not working. Before approaching us, they had spent a lot of time trying to get an A-lender approval, but they were declined because the income did not support the requested mortgage. When they came to us, only about five days were left before closing. The builder was demanding a very high penalty for extending the closing, even by a few days. We arranged a rush mortgage from an alternative lender strictly as a six-month bridge. We then arranged a mortgage from a B lender under a stated-income program supported by 12 months of bank statements.

2. Borrower Profile

The borrowers were purchasing a primary residence in London, Ontario. The husband worked as a truck driver but had very low verifiable income for conventional mortgage purposes. The wife was not working. The file had already been declined by A lenders before the clients approached us. Borrower identities, employer or business details, income figures, credit score, and lender names are not disclosed.

3. Property Profile

The subject property was a builder purchase in London, Ontario, intended as the clients’ primary residence. The clients were close to the contractual closing date when they approached us. Exact address, builder name, purchase price, mortgage amount, down payment, loan-to-value, rate, fees, and lender names are not disclosed.

4. The Challenge

The clients had very little time left before closing, and the builder was not willing to extend without a major penalty. A-lender financing was not available because the husband’s verifiable income was too low and the wife was not working. The file needed to close quickly, but it also needed a real exit strategy. A short-term bridge without a planned B-lender exit would have simply created a new maturity problem six months later.

5. Why Conventional Solutions Failed

A-lender financing failed because the clients’ verifiable income did not support the requested mortgage. The husband’s truck-driver income could not be used strongly enough under standard documentation rules, and the wife was not working. By the time the clients approached us, there was not enough time to continue pursuing ordinary A-lender options. The builder’s extension penalty created additional pressure, making a rush bridge necessary.

6. Our Analysis

Our analysis focused on two separate problems: closing the purchase immediately and creating a realistic exit after closing. The immediate problem was the builder deadline. The longer-term problem was income documentation. We arranged an alternative-lender bridge for six months so the clients could close, but we did not treat the bridge as the final solution. The exit was planned through a B-lender stated-income program supported by 12 months of bank statements, which better matched the truck-driver income profile.

7. Financing Structure

The file was first structured as a rush alternative-lender bridge mortgage for six months to close the builder purchase. The exit structure was a B-lender stated-income mortgage supported by 12 months of bank statements. Public details do not disclose the lender names, mortgage amounts, rates, fees, terms, amortizations, purchase price, down payment, bank-statement income calculation, or final loan-to-value.

8. Why the Solution Worked

The solution worked because it separated the emergency from the permanent structure. A conventional lender could not approve the file in time, and the builder penalty made delay expensive. The alternative-lender bridge solved the immediate closing problem. The B-lender stated-income mortgage then solved the more important long-term issue by using a documentation method better suited to the borrower’s income pattern. The underwriting principle is that bridge financing should buy time for the right exit, not become an expensive dead end.

9. Key Lessons

  • A builder purchase should not be left until the final days if income is not straightforward.
  • Low verifiable income can make A-lender approval impossible even when the borrower has real cash flow.
  • A rush bridge mortgage can protect a closing when there is no time left, but it must have an exit.
  • A six-month bridge should be used carefully and only with a realistic next step.
  • B-lender stated-income programs may work when 12 months of bank statements support the income story.
  • Builder extension penalties can make delay very expensive.
  • The best solution may require two steps: immediate bridge financing and then a more suitable stated-income mortgage.

10. Related HopeWell Resources

Suggested Diagrams

  • Rush builder closing timeline showing A-lender declines, five days left, builder penalty risk, alternative-lender bridge, and B-lender stated-income exit
  • Two-step financing diagram showing six-month bridge mortgage first and B-lender stated-income mortgage second
  • Stated-income documentation diagram showing 12 months bank statements, deposit review, income reasonability, lender approval, and bridge payout
  • Decision tree showing A-lender decline due low verifiable income, builder extension penalty, bridge financing, and planned refinance exit

Real-world experience

Related underwriting case studies

Explore anonymized Ontario mortgage files that show how borrower circumstances, property details, lender policy, costs, and exit strategy can interact.

View all case studies →
Recently FundedWhitby

Whitby Rush Builder Purchase Closed with Private Mortgage for UAE Expat Borrower

Whitby clients were buying a builder property and approached us barely four days before closing after spending too much time with other brokers and banks. They needed 80% LTV. The borrower was a Canadian citizen working as an expat in the UAE and had strong, verifiable foreign income. However, the Canadian credit profile was weak because of limited Canadian credit history and a few collections. Most A lenders declined because of credit, while B lenders were not comfortable doing 80% LTV given the location, foreign-income structure, and credit concerns. We arranged a rush private mortgage strictly as a one-year bridge and advised the clients to pay off the collections. The plan is to revisit refinance after the credit profile improves and the file becomes better positioned for institutional lending.

Solution
Private mortgage
Purpose
Urgent builder purchase closing with one-year private mortgage bridge
Whitby Ontariobuilder purchaserush closing
Read the case study
Recently FundedCambridge

Cambridge B-Lender Second-Position HELOC Consolidated Junior Mortgages, Judgment and Credit Card Debt

A Cambridge client had three mortgages, a judgment, and very high credit card debt. They approached us for a debt consolidation solution. We recommended a HELOC in second position from a B lender. A B lender was needed because the credit score was low, and breaking the existing first mortgage did not make financial sense. The new second-position HELOC helped consolidate the high-cost debts and lowered the client’s monthly payments by approximately $3,100.

Solution
B-lender second-position HELOC
Purpose
B-lender second-position HELOC to consolidate high-cost debts while preserving first mortgage
Cambridge OntarioB-lender HELOCsecond-position HELOC
Read the case study
Recently FundedVaughan

Vaughan Preconstruction Purchase Closed with Open Private Mortgage and Sale Exit

A Vaughan client had entered into a preconstruction purchase after advice from friends. He soon realized that he could neither qualify for the required mortgage nor afford to keep the home. Based on his income, he would not qualify with an A lender or B lender. His goal became to close the purchase and then sell the property. We arranged a short-term open private mortgage so he could close the transaction. The open mortgage was recommended because he planned to sell the home and did not want to face a prepayment penalty when repaying the mortgage after sale.

Solution
Private mortgage
Purpose
Short-term open private mortgage to close preconstruction purchase and allow sale-based exit
Vaughan Ontariopreconstruction purchaseprivate mortgage
Read the case study
Recently FundedCambridge

Cambridge Senior Clients Used B-Lender Second-Position HELOC for Debt Consolidation

Two senior clients in Cambridge were receiving CPP and OAS income from the government. The husband also received a pension from his employer. Their income was limited, and they had accumulated unsecured debt that they wanted to consolidate for better cash flow. We reviewed their situation and recommended a HELOC in second position from a B lender. A full refinance was not recommended because the penalties for breaking the existing mortgage were too high. A private mortgage was also too costly and had no realistic exit. The B-lender second-position HELOC allowed the clients to consolidate debt while preserving the existing first mortgage.

Solution
B-lender second-position HELOC
Purpose
B-lender second-position HELOC to consolidate unsecured debt and improve cash flow
Cambridge Ontariosenior clientsB-lender HELOC
Read the case study
Recently FundedMarkham

Markham Self-Employed Trucker Approved with B-Lender Stated-Income Exception

A self-employed truck driver in Markham had incorporated only about one year earlier. Many lenders require at least two years of self-employment history, so the file was not suitable for an A-lender approval. However, before incorporating, the client had worked as a truck driver on payroll. We approached a B lender and requested an exception to the two-year self-employment rule. The rationale was that the client had not entered a new industry; he had moved from payroll trucking employment into incorporated trucking work. We supported the file with previous employer T4s and 12 months of business bank statements, and the lender reviewed the income under a stated-income approach.

Solution
B-lender stated-income mortgage
Purpose
Residential mortgage financing
Markham Ontarioself-employed truckertruck driver mortgage
Read the case study
Recently FundedLondon

London First-Time Buyer Approved with Two Jobs and Strong T4 Income

A 23-year-old first-time home buyer in London applied as a single applicant. She earned more than $125,000 annually while working two jobs. Although the income was strong, some lenders are cautious when a borrower relies on two jobs because they want to understand whether the income is stable and sustainable. HopeWell reviewed the income history and presented the file with a clear explanation that both jobs were in the same industry and supported by two years of T4s. The lender accepted the explanation and approved an insured mortgage.

Solution
Insured A-lender mortgage
Purpose
First-time home purchase
London Ontariofirst-time home buyeryoung borrower
Read the case study