← Back to Recently Funded

Recently Funded

Underwriting Case Study

North York Rental Portfolio Moved from Private Mortgages to A Lender Using Rental Worksheet Strategy

North York clients owned five properties in total: one primary residence and four rental properties. They had received incomplete advice and were told by their realtor that the last two rental properties they purchased could only be financed through private mortgages. As a result, they were paying high interest. We reviewed the entire portfolio. Their personal income was good, and the properties were generating rental income. Every lender treats rental income differently. Some lenders use an offset method, while others use rental worksheets. If the worksheet shows a surplus, the surplus can be added to income; if it shows a shortfall, the shortfall may be added to liabilities. The key was identifying a lender with a more generous rental worksheet. We obtained an A-lender approval.

Details are anonymized to protect client, lender, investor, and transaction privacy. This case is for general education only and is not a commitment to lend, a guarantee of approval, or legal, tax, or financial advice.

1. Executive Summary

North York clients owned five properties in total: one primary residence and four rental properties. They had received incomplete advice and were told by their realtor that the last two rental properties they purchased could only be financed through private mortgages. As a result, they were paying high interest. We reviewed the entire portfolio. Their personal income was good, and the properties were generating rental income. Every lender treats rental income differently. Some lenders use an offset method, while others use rental worksheets. If the worksheet shows a surplus, the surplus can be added to income; if it shows a shortfall, the shortfall may be added to liabilities. The key was identifying a lender with a more generous rental worksheet. We obtained an A-lender approval.

2. Borrower Profile

The borrowers were North York clients with a five-property portfolio. They owned one primary residence and four rental properties. They had good personal income and rental income from the investment properties. Two of the rental properties were financed privately after the clients were told private mortgages were their only option. Borrower identities, occupations, income amounts, credit scores, rental amounts, and lender names are not disclosed.

3. Property Profile

The portfolio consisted of one owner-occupied primary residence and four rental properties. The last two rental properties purchased had private mortgage financing at high interest. Exact addresses, property values, rent amounts, mortgage balances, property taxes, insurance, condo fees if any, loan-to-value, rates, and lender names are not disclosed.

4. The Challenge

The clients had been paying high private mortgage interest on two rental properties because they had been told private lending was their only option. The file was complex because the borrowers owned multiple properties, and rental-income treatment across a portfolio can change the entire approval outcome. A lender with a conservative rental calculation could have shown high liabilities or rental shortfalls, while the right lender worksheet could recognize the portfolio more accurately.

5. Why Conventional Solutions Failed

The earlier issue was not necessarily that A-lender financing was impossible. The issue was that the portfolio had not been analyzed under the right lender policy. Rental portfolio files are sensitive to how each lender calculates rental income. A conservative lender may apply a rental offset that gives limited benefit, or a worksheet that produces deficits. Another lender may use a more favourable worksheet that recognizes rental surplus more accurately. Without reviewing multiple lender policies, the file can be wrongly treated as private-only.

6. Our Analysis

Our analysis focused on the full portfolio rather than the two private mortgages alone. We reviewed personal income, rent from each property, mortgage payments, property taxes, carrying costs, and how different lenders would calculate rental surplus or shortfall. The goal was to identify an A lender whose rental worksheet gave the most accurate and favourable treatment to the portfolio. Once the right lender was selected, the file could be structured as an A-lender refinance instead of remaining in private lending.

7. Financing Structure

The file was structured as an A-lender refinance to replace private mortgage exposure on the rental properties. The lender reviewed the clients’ personal income and rental portfolio using its rental worksheet. The worksheet treatment helped support qualification by recognizing rental income and calculating surplus or shortfall according to lender policy. Public details do not disclose the lender name, mortgage amounts, rates, fees, property values, rental income, mortgage balances, or final rental worksheet calculation.

8. Why the Solution Worked

The solution worked because lender selection matched the portfolio. The clients had good personal income and income-producing rental properties, but the file needed a lender that would calculate rental income properly. The generous rental worksheet improved the debt-service picture enough for A-lender approval. The underwriting principle is that rental portfolio files are often won or lost at the worksheet level. The same rents and mortgages can produce different approvals with different lenders.

9. Key Lessons

  • Owning multiple rental properties does not automatically mean the borrower needs private lending.
  • Rental income treatment can vary dramatically between lenders.
  • A generous rental worksheet can materially improve qualification.
  • Rental surplus may help income, while rental shortfall can hurt ratios.
  • Private-only advice should be tested against actual lender policies.
  • A full portfolio review is essential when borrowers own several properties.
  • The right A lender can sometimes replace expensive private mortgages on rental properties.

10. Related HopeWell Resources

Suggested Diagrams

  • Five-property portfolio diagram showing primary residence, four rental properties, two private mortgages, rental income, and A-lender refinance
  • Rental worksheet comparison diagram showing conservative lender worksheet versus generous lender worksheet and final approval impact
  • Rental income treatment decision tree showing rental offset, rental worksheet, surplus added to income, shortfall added to liabilities, and lender selection
  • Private mortgage exit timeline showing private-only advice, high-interest rental mortgages, full portfolio review, A-lender worksheet selection, and refinance approval

Real-world experience

Related underwriting case studies

Explore anonymized Ontario mortgage files that show how borrower circumstances, property details, lender policy, costs, and exit strategy can interact.

View all case studies →
Recently FundedBrampton

Brampton Rental Portfolio Moved from High-Interest Private Mortgage to B Lender

Two self-employed friends in Brampton owned several rental properties together. They had purchased another rental property the previous year, but because of large mortgages on the existing properties and rental deficits after expenses such as property tax, insurance, and vacancy, they could not qualify on the A side. The property had been placed with a private lender at a very high interest rate and approximately 80% LTV. The clients approached us for a solution. We analyzed their business bank statements and identified a B lender that could consider stated income based on 12 months of bank statements and apply up to a 90% rental offset, subject to policy. The clients moved from a high-interest private mortgage to a lower-interest B-lender mortgage.

Solution
B-lender stated-income refinance
Purpose
Private mortgage exit and rental property refinance
Brampton Ontariorental portfoliotwo self-employed borrowers
Read the case study
Recently FundedBrantford

Brantford A-Lender HELOC Using Corporate NIAT, Rental Surplus and Basement Rent Offset

Brantford clients co-owned three properties: a primary residence where the son lived with his parents, plus two rental properties. The primary residence was free and clear, and they wanted a HELOC secured against it. The husband worked as a truck driver, but his personal T1 income was very low because income was collected through a corporation account. We used corporate NIAT less dividends where lender policy allowed. The son was salaried, and the wife was also salaried. We also used the rental worksheet of a major A-side bank to calculate the rental position from the two rental properties. One rental property showed a surplus and one showed a deficit, but overall the rental worksheet showed a surplus. The subject property also had basement rental income, but lenders generally do not add the subject property to the rental worksheet; instead, the basement rent was treated as an offset. We approached a major A lender and secured the HELOC they needed.

Solution
A-lender HELOC
Purpose
A-lender HELOC on free-and-clear primary residence
Brantford OntarioA-lender HELOCfree and clear primary residence
Read the case study
Recently FundedMississauga

Mississauga Retired Condo Owners Approved Using Rental Worksheet and High-Net-Worth Program

Mississauga clients owned two condos. They lived in one and rented the other. Both were retired and had only CPP and OAS income, so their regular income was low. Rental income treatment became critical because every lender handles rental income differently. Some lenders use an offset method, while others use a rental worksheet. If the worksheet shows a surplus, the surplus can be added to income. If it shows a deficit, the deficit may be added to liabilities. We approached a lender with a generous rental worksheet and a high-net-worth program. The clients had accumulated good savings over time, and the lender approved the file.

Solution
A-lender mortgage
Purpose
A-lender mortgage approval using rental worksheet surplus and high-net-worth program
Mississauga Ontarioretired clientstwo condos
Read the case study
Recently FundedKitchener

Kitchener Self-Employed Clients Approved on A Side Using Rental Income

Self-employed clients in Kitchener believed they would not qualify on the A side and assumed their only options were a B lender or private lender. The husband owned a business and paid salary to his wife from the same business. Their verifiable income looked low on a basic review. However, they also owned two rental properties that were free and clear. We used the rental income from both properties, the husband’s average income from T1 Generals, and the wife’s average T4 income. The file was approved by an A lender.

Solution
A-lender mortgage
Purpose
Residential mortgage financing
Kitchener Ontarioself-employed mortgagehusband owns business
Read the case study
Recently FundedOttawa

Ottawa Free-and-Clear Rental Property Used for Short-Term Private Mortgage Bridge

An Ottawa client owned a free-and-clear rental property while living in the United States with family. He had filed a lawsuit in the U.S. and urgently needed money to finance that lawsuit. He was not working, so there was no current employment income to support A-lender or B-lender financing. We arranged a private mortgage against the Ottawa rental property. The exit strategy was clear: the client was expecting a payout from another lawsuit he had already won within approximately three to four months. The private mortgage was therefore structured strictly as a short-term bridge.

Solution
Private mortgage
Purpose
Short-term private mortgage bridge to finance lawsuit with expected lawsuit-payout exit
Ottawa Ontarioprivate mortgagefree-and-clear property
Read the case study
Recently FundedBrampton

Brampton Truck Driver Refinance from Private Mortgage to B Lender Using Bank Statements

Brampton clients were with a private lender. The husband was a truck driver, and the wife was salaried. The husband’s income declared on personal T1s was very low, which made traditional A-lender qualification difficult. We reviewed the file and recommended a full refinance with a B lender based on stated income supported by 12 months of bank statements. This allowed the clients to move away from private lending into a more suitable B-lender structure.

Solution
B-lender refinance
Purpose
B-lender refinance to exit private mortgage using stated income supported by 12 months of bank statements
Brampton Ontarioprivate mortgage exitB-lender refinance
Read the case study