Part 5 · Managing and Restructuring an Existing Mortgage

Chapter 25Mortgage Refinancing

6 min read1,248 words Full contents

What refinancing means

Refinancing replaces or materially restructures existing secured financing.

A refinance may:

Replace the current lender

Increase or decrease the mortgage amount

Change the amortization

Consolidate debts

Access equity

Pay out a second mortgage or HELOC

Add or remove a borrower

Change ownership, subject to legal and lender review

Exit private or alternative financing

Fund renovations, business activity or investment

A refinance is underwritten as a current transaction. The lender reassesses the borrower, property, secured debts, use of funds and requested structure.

Common refinance objectives

ObjectiveUnderwriting question
Lower interest costDo the rate savings exceed the penalty and transaction costs?
Lower monthly paymentIs the reduction caused by lower cost or merely a longer amortization?
Debt consolidationWill the debts actually be repaid and prevented from rebuilding?
Equity takeoutIs sufficient value, income and repayment capacity available?
CRA obligationsWhat amount is owed, what security or liens exist and what professional advice is required?
RenovationsWill funds be advanced at once or through a construction/improvement program?
Business or investment useCan the borrower support the debt, and has tax treatment been reviewed?
Private-mortgage exitHas the original qualification obstacle been corrected?
Borrower or ownership changeDo the remaining borrowers qualify, and what legal transfer is required?

Maximum institutional refinance LTV

For a standard uninsured residential mortgage at a federally regulated institution, the legal maximum LTV is currently 80% of the lender-accepted property value. The lender may impose a lower limit based on borrower risk, property, location or product. OSFI also expects the LTV to be recalculated at every refinance using an appropriate current valuation.

Classification: Federal prudential and statutory framework applying to federally regulated residential lenders.

Material qualification: Provincially regulated credit unions, private lenders and other lenders may operate under different legal and policy frameworks. A private lender’s willingness to consider a particular LTV does not make that leverage affordable or suitable.

The 80% uninsured limit should not be confused with:

High-ratio insured purchase rules

The 65% revolving HELOC limit

Lower limits for non-conforming mortgages

Private-lender risk limits

Commercial mortgage LTV policies

Construction or bridge-financing structures

Refinance proceeds and transaction costs

The amount available is not simply 80% of value minus the current first mortgage.

The refinance must account for:

Existing mortgage payout

Prepayment penalty

HELOC and second-mortgage payout

Legal fees

Appraisal

Discharge charges

Lender fees

Brokerage fees where applicable

Tax or judgment payouts

Interest adjustments

Net cash required by the borrower

The final calculation should show both:

Gross new mortgage

Net funds available after all payouts and costs

The complete economic comparison

A refinance should compare:

Current balance and rate

Remaining term and amortization

Prepayment penalty

New rate and product

All transaction costs

New mortgage balance

New monthly payment

Remaining balance after a chosen comparison period

Total interest under comparable assumptions

Expected time the borrower will keep the property or mortgage

A lower payment is not automatically a lower cost.

Refinance break-even and the amortization-reset problem

Assumptions

Current mortgage balance: $500,000

Current rate: 6.40%

Remaining amortization: 18 years

Current monthly payment: $3,880.32

New rate: 5.10%

Penalty, legal, appraisal and discharge costs: $15,500

Costs are added to the new mortgage for illustration

New mortgage principal: $515,500

New amortization: 25 years

New monthly payment: $3,027.59

Rates remain unchanged solely for comparison

No additional prepayments

Variables

TC = Total transaction cost

CP = Current monthly payment

NP = New monthly payment

MS = Monthly cash-flow savings

BE = Simplified break-even period

Formula

Monthly cash-flow savings = Current monthly payment − New monthly payment

Break-even period = Total transaction cost ÷ Monthly cash-flow savings

Calculation

MS = $3,880.32 − $3,027.59

MS = $852.73 per month

BE = $15,500 ÷ $852.73

BE = 18.2 months

Result under the simplified formula

The upfront costs appear to be recovered through payment savings after approximately 18 months.

That result is incomplete.

After five years:

Estimated balance if the original mortgage continued: $412,178

Estimated balance on the new 25-year mortgage: $456,970

Additional balance remaining under the refinance: approximately $44,792

The payment declined partly because repayment was stretched from 18 remaining years to 25 years.

Comparison if the 18-year amortization were preserved

At the same new rate and $515,500 principal, an 18-year amortization would produce a payment of approximately:

$3,637.13 per month

The monthly saving would be only:

$3,880.32 − $3,637.13 = $243.19

The estimated balance after five years would be approximately $415,468, much closer to the original mortgage trajectory.

Interpretation

The simple break-even formula is useful for cash-flow screening, but it ignores:

Amortization reset

Different remaining balances

Future renewal rates

Time value of money

Debt consolidated

Tax consequences

Behaviour after monthly payments fall

A suitable analysis should show both payment relief and the debt remaining.

Refinancing to consolidate debt

A refinance can replace higher-rate unsecured debt with lower-rate secured debt. That may improve monthly cash flow, but it also converts previously unsecured debt into debt secured against the home.

The borrower should understand:

The home is now security for the consolidated debt

Repayment may be extended over many more years

Repaid credit cards may be used again

A future sale or refinance must repay the larger mortgage

The apparent interest saving depends on repayment discipline

Debt consolidation receives fuller treatment in Chapter 27.

Refinancing to pay CRA obligations

CRA debt does not automatically require a private mortgage. The outcome may depend on:

Amount owing

Existing registration or lien

Current income

Equity

Credit

Tax-filing status

Payment arrangement

Lender policy

Legal priority

A mortgage professional can structure financing, but tax liability, deductibility and settlement advice belong to the appropriate tax professional or lawyer.

Business and investment use

The fact that borrowed funds are secured against a personal residence does not, by itself, determine whether the interest is deductible.

CRA’s published position generally requires tracing the use of borrowed money to an eligible income-earning purpose. Personal use is not converted into deductible use merely because the property securing the loan is an investment property, and business use is not automatically disqualified merely because a principal residence provides the security.

Classification: Federal tax issue.

Sources: Canada Revenue Agency Income Tax Folio S3-F6-C1 and current rental-expense guidance.

Material qualification: Deductibility is fact-specific and requires accounting or tax advice.

When refinancing may be a poor choice

A refinance may be unsuitable where:

Break costs exceed realistic savings

The borrower expects to sell shortly

A low-rate first mortgage would be unnecessarily replaced

A smaller HELOC or second mortgage is cheaper overall

The new payment is lower only because amortization is greatly extended

The borrower repeatedly rebuilds consolidated debt

Equity will be exhausted without solving the underlying problem

The proposed private-mortgage exit remains speculative

Sale or formal debt advice would be safer

Eligibility for additional debt does not establish that extracting the equity is suitable.

Aurora self-employed borrowers: private mortgage to A-lender refinance

A self-employed husband and wife in Aurora had remained in a high-interest private mortgage for almost two and a half years. They had been told that their low personal reported income made institutional financing impossible.

Our review examined:

T1 General income

Corporate financial statements

Corporate NIAT

Dividends already reported personally

Overall debt-service position

The policies of lenders willing to consider corporate income

Under the selected A lender’s policy, the file used the borrowers’ average personal income together with an eligible portion of corporate NIAT after adjusting for dividends already counted personally.

The private mortgage was refinanced with an A lender.

The key principle was not that corporate NIAT is universally accepted or that a fixed percentage applies across lenders. It was:

Before renewing or replacing an expensive private mortgage, the original qualification problem should be re-underwritten from the beginning.

The borrowers had not remained private because private lending was necessarily their only option. They remained private because the complete income structure had not previously been analyzed under the correct institutional policy.

If You Remember Only Three Things

A lower monthly payment may result from extending amortization rather than reducing true borrowing cost.

A standard federally regulated residential refinance is generally limited to 80% LTV, and individual lenders may lend less.

Every refinance should compare the penalty, fees, new balance, payment and remaining debt—not only the new rate.