← Back to Recently Funded

Recently Funded

Underwriting Case Study

Refinance from Private Mortgage to A-Lender Approval

A borrower was paying approximately 10% interest with a private lender and approached HopeWell expecting a possible B-lender refinance. After reviewing the credit, income, property, and full file strength, HopeWell identified that an A-lender submission might be possible if the correct exceptions were requested and supported. The file was approved by an A lender, reducing the interest rate by approximately 60% and cutting the monthly payment to less than half.

Details are anonymized to protect client, lender, investor, and transaction privacy. This case is for general education only and is not a commitment to lend, a guarantee of approval, or legal, tax, or financial advice.

1. Executive Summary

A borrower was paying approximately 10% interest with a private lender and approached HopeWell expecting a possible B-lender refinance. After reviewing the credit, income, property, and full file strength, HopeWell identified that an A-lender submission might be possible if the correct exceptions were requested and supported. The file was approved by an A lender, reducing the interest rate by approximately 60% and cutting the monthly payment to less than half.

2. Borrower Profile

The borrower was already in a private mortgage. The borrower’s identity, exact location, income, property value, loan amount, and lender information are not disclosed. The relevant underwriting issue was whether the borrower was still limited to private or B-lender financing or whether the file could be positioned for A-lender review.

3. Property Profile

The file involved a residential property in Ontario. Occupancy, exact address, value, and mortgage amount are not disclosed.

4. The Challenge

The client was already with a private lender and was paying a significantly higher interest rate than typical institutional mortgage options. At first, the expected solution appeared to be a B-lender refinance. However, the file required a deeper review because there were certain areas where the client did not fit perfectly into standard A-lender guidelines.

5. Why Conventional Solutions Failed

A common assumption is that a borrower in a private mortgage must refinance into another private mortgage or a B-lender mortgage before returning to an A lender. That may be true in many cases, but it is not always true. If the borrower’s credit, income, property, and documentation have improved or if the file has compensating strengths, some A lenders may consider exceptions. The file needed a deeper review rather than being categorized automatically as a B-lender file.

6. Our Analysis

HopeWell analyzed the file by asking whether the private mortgage was still necessary. The review included the borrower’s current credit profile, income, property strength, existing private mortgage terms, debt-service ratios, and the areas where an A lender might require exceptions. The strategy was to identify a lender whose policy and risk appetite could support the file with the right explanation and documentation.

7. Financing Structure

The file was structured as an A-lender refinance. The new mortgage paid out the existing private mortgage. Confidential details such as lender name, exact rate, mortgage amount, and property address are not disclosed.

8. Why the Solution Worked

The solution worked because the file was not treated as automatically limited to B-lender or private financing. The underwriting principle was that a private mortgage is often a temporary bridge. If the borrower’s profile supports it, and if lender policy allows the necessary exceptions, the borrower may be able to return to institutional financing sooner than expected.

9. Key Lessons

  • Borrowers in private mortgages should have an exit strategy reviewed before maturity.
  • A B-lender refinance may not be the only option after a private mortgage.
  • Exception-based A-lender approvals require strong documentation and the right lender fit.
  • The monthly payment difference between private and institutional lending can be significant.
  • A private mortgage should generally be treated as short-term financing unless there is a clear reason otherwise.

10. Related HopeWell Resources

Suggested Diagrams

  • Private-to-A-lender refinance pathway diagram
  • Before-and-after payment comparison chart
  • Mortgage exit strategy timeline

Real-world experience

Related underwriting case studies

Explore anonymized Ontario mortgage files that show how borrower circumstances, property details, lender policy, costs, and exit strategy can interact.

View all case studies
Recently FundedHarcourt

Harcourt Leasehold Self-Build Moved from Private Construction Loan to A-Lender Refinance

This was one of the most complex files: a client was self-building his primary residence on leased land in a remote Harcourt-area location. The file had multiple lender concerns at the same time: leasehold land, self-build construction, remote location, very poor credit after a recent medical condition, and temporary work interruption due to medical issues. We arranged a short-term private construction loan to help him finish construction and consolidate debts. After approximately seven months, construction was complete, he had returned to work, and his credit score had improved. Leasehold land was still a challenge, but we identified an A lender in the broker channel that lends on leased-land properties and refinanced the full structure.

Solution
Private construction loan followed by A-lender refinance
Purpose
Construction completion, debt consolidation, credit improvement, and refinance exit
Harcourt Ontarioleasehold landself-build
Read the case study
Recently FundedBrampton

Brampton Truck Driver Refinance from Private Mortgage to B Lender Using Bank Statements

Brampton clients were with a private lender. The husband was a truck driver, and the wife was salaried. The husband’s income declared on personal T1s was very low, which made traditional A-lender qualification difficult. We reviewed the file and recommended a full refinance with a B lender based on stated income supported by 12 months of bank statements. This allowed the clients to move away from private lending into a more suitable B-lender structure.

Solution
B-lender refinance
Purpose
B-lender refinance to exit private mortgage using stated income supported by 12 months of bank statements
Brampton Ontarioprivate mortgage exitB-lender refinance
Read the case study
Recently FundedHamilton

Hamilton C-Suite Executive Refinanced from Private Mortgage to A Lender Despite High Support Obligations

A Hamilton client was a C-suite executive with strong income but was stuck with a private lender paying very high interest. The file was complex because the client had gone through multiple family-law obligations and was paying high alimony and support payments. Lenders consider ongoing alimony and child support as liabilities, so these payments are included when calculating the total debt service ratio. Even with strong income, the ratios were going high. The credit score was on the margin, and there was also significant unsecured debt. We reviewed the full financials and recommended a full refinance. We obtained an A-lender approval with a credit-score exception, allowing the client to refinance out of the private mortgage.

Solution
A-lender refinance
Purpose
A-lender refinance to exit private mortgage and consolidate unsecured debt
Hamilton OntarioC-suite executiveprivate mortgage exit
Read the case study
Recently FundedBrampton

Brampton Rental Portfolio Moved from High-Interest Private Mortgage to B Lender

Two self-employed friends in Brampton owned several rental properties together. They had purchased another rental property the previous year, but because of large mortgages on the existing properties and rental deficits after expenses such as property tax, insurance, and vacancy, they could not qualify on the A side. The property had been placed with a private lender at a very high interest rate and approximately 80% LTV. The clients approached us for a solution. We analyzed their business bank statements and identified a B lender that could consider stated income based on 12 months of bank statements and apply up to a 90% rental offset, subject to policy. The clients moved from a high-interest private mortgage to a lower-interest B-lender mortgage.

Solution
B-lender stated-income refinance
Purpose
Private mortgage exit and rental property refinance
Brampton Ontariorental portfoliotwo self-employed borrowers
Read the case study
Recently FundedAurora

Aurora Self-Employed Clients Moved from Private Mortgage to A Lender

Aurora clients had been given very poor advice. Both husband and wife were self-employed and declared lower personal income. A friend had told them they could only qualify for a private mortgage and would never qualify with an institutional lender. Believing that advice, they stayed with a private lender for almost two and a half years, paying very high interest. When they finally approached us, we thoroughly reviewed their financial documents and identified that they could qualify on the A side. We used the average of their T1 Generals and 60% of corporate NIAT less dividends under lender policy. When the clients learned they qualified with an A bank, the relief was overwhelming because they had believed for years that private lending was their only option.

Solution
A-lender refinance
Purpose
Private mortgage exit and A-lender refinance using self-employed income analysis
Aurora Ontarioprivate mortgage exitA-lender refinance
Read the case study
Recently FundedNorth York

North York Rental Portfolio Moved from Private Mortgages to A Lender Using Rental Worksheet Strategy

North York clients owned five properties in total: one primary residence and four rental properties. They had received incomplete advice and were told by their realtor that the last two rental properties they purchased could only be financed through private mortgages. As a result, they were paying high interest. We reviewed the entire portfolio. Their personal income was good, and the properties were generating rental income. Every lender treats rental income differently. Some lenders use an offset method, while others use rental worksheets. If the worksheet shows a surplus, the surplus can be added to income; if it shows a shortfall, the shortfall may be added to liabilities. The key was identifying a lender with a more generous rental worksheet. We obtained an A-lender approval.

Solution
A-lender refinance
Purpose
A-lender refinance to exit private mortgages using favourable rental worksheet treatment
North York Ontariorental portfoliofive properties
Read the case study