Part 2 · How Mortgage Approval Actually Works

Chapter 11GDS, TDS, Stress Testing and Real Affordability

5 min read1,144 words Full contents

Debt-service ratios estimate whether gross income can support the proposed housing costs and other debt.

They are qualification tools. They are not household budgets.

Gross Debt Service ratio

Gross Debt Service, or GDS, compares qualifying housing costs with gross income.

A simplified formula is:

GDS=

Gross income

Qualifying mortgage payment+property taxes+heat+applicable condo or site costs

×100

For CMHC-insured applications, 50% of condominium fees is generally included, while 100% of applicable site or ground rent is used. CMHC currently limits GDS to 39% under its standard homeowner insurance criteria.

Total Debt Service ratio

Total Debt Service, or TDS, adds other debt obligations:

TDS=

Gross income

GDS housing costs+other debt obligations

×100

Other obligations may include:

Credit cards

Personal lines of credit

Car loans

Student loans

Other mortgages

Secured lines of credit

Court-ordered support

Other recurring credit obligations

CMHC’s current standard maximum is 44% TDS. For its calculations, unsecured revolving debts are generally assigned at least 3% of the outstanding balance as a monthly payment, while secured-line payments are assessed under its stated amortizing-payment method.

These are CMHC standards. Private insurers and individual lenders may use different inputs, limits or exception policies.

What is the qualifying payment?

The payment used in GDS and TDS may be higher than the borrower’s actual contractual payment.

For CMHC-insured mortgages, the current qualifying rate is the greater of:

Contract rate plus 2 percentage points

5.25%

CMHC currently applies maximum ratios of 39% GDS and 44% TDS under its standard purchase criteria.

For uninsured mortgages at federally regulated lenders, OSFI requires the greater of the contract rate plus the Superintendent-set buffer and the Superintendent-set floor. OSFI reviews the calibration at least annually, so the applicable rate must be rechecked before publication and before an application is submitted.

Worked example — Contract payment, qualifying payment, GDS and TDS

Illustrative assumptions

Mortgage amount: $600,000

Contract rate: 4.50%

Amortization: 25 years

Payment frequency: monthly

Canadian mortgage interest convention: nominal rate compounded semi-annually

Stress-test rate: 6.50%, because contract rate plus 2% is higher than 5.25%

Gross household income: $13,000 per month

Property taxes: $500 per month

Heating: $150 per month

Other monthly debt obligations: $700

No condominium fee

Mortgage-insurance premium excluded from this simplified example

Contractual mortgage payment

At 4.50%, the approximate monthly payment is:

$3,320.84

Qualifying mortgage payment

At 6.50%, the approximate qualifying payment is:

$4,018.94

The borrower is therefore assessed using a payment approximately:

$4,018.94−$3,320.84=$698.10

higher than the initial contractual payment.

GDS calculation

GDS=

$13,000

$4,018.94+$500+$150

×100

GDS=35.91%

TDS calculation

TDS=

$13,000

$4,018.94+$500+$150+$700

×100

TDS=41.30%

The ratios fall within CMHC’s standard 39% and 44% maximums. That does not establish approval. Credit, property, down payment, documentation, insurer acceptance and all other conditions remain relevant.

What GDS and TDS leave out

Debt-service ratios use gross income, before income tax and payroll deductions.

They may not fully capture:

Childcare

Food

Transportation

Insurance

Utilities other than the prescribed heat amount

Education

Medical expenses

Support provided voluntarily to relatives

Home maintenance

Condo special assessments

Irregular business income

Retirement saving

Lifestyle spending

Future family changes

Emergency reserves

Property repairs

A household can meet a lender’s ratio and still feel financially constrained.

Qualification maximum versus safe maximum

The lender’s maximum is designed to determine whether the loan fits a credit policy. The borrower’s safe maximum should consider after-tax cash flow and resilience.

A practical affordability test should ask:

What will remain after tax and payroll deductions?

Can the household absorb a higher payment at renewal?

What happens if one income falls temporarily?

Is there an emergency reserve after closing?

Are childcare, vehicle and commuting costs likely to change?

Does the property require significant repairs?

Is the borrower relying on overtime or bonuses?

Is the payment comfortable without repeatedly using credit?

Eligibility at the lender’s limit does not automatically establish suitability.

How other debts affect qualification

A borrower can sometimes increase mortgage qualification more efficiently by reducing debt than by making a slightly larger down payment.

For example, eliminating a $700 monthly car payment directly lowers TDS by $700. Putting the same lump sum toward the purchase may reduce the mortgage payment by much less each month.

The better decision depends on:

Interest rate

Remaining debt term

Cash reserves

Down-payment threshold

Insurance premium

Lender calculations

Need for emergency funds

A borrower should not pay off debt before the lender or broker confirms the intended treatment and the required documentary trail.

Rental-income treatment

Rental income can affect both the numerator and denominator of debt-service calculations.

Depending on the lender or insurer, rent may be:

Added partly to income

Used to offset mortgage costs

Reduced by a standardized expense factor

Taken from tax-return net income

Treated differently for the subject property and other rentals

This is one reason online affordability calculators can differ materially from an underwritten result.

Amortization and qualification

A longer amortization lowers the calculated payment but slows principal repayment and generally increases total interest.

Illustrative amortization comparison

Assume a $600,000 mortgage at 4.50%, with the rate remaining unchanged for the entire amortization solely for comparison:

Measure25-year amortization30-year amortization
Monthly payment$3,320.84$3,025.29
Payment reduction$295.55
Balance after five years$526,778$546,602
Principal repaid in five years$73,222$53,398
Interest paid in first five years$126,029$128,119
Total interest over full amortization$396,251$489,106

The 30-year structure reduces the initial monthly payment by approximately $296, but in this constant-rate illustration it produces approximately $92,854 more total interest and leaves approximately $19,824 more principal outstanding after five years.

Actual Canadian mortgages renew during the amortization, so the future rate will almost certainly differ. The illustration isolates the effect of amortization rather than predicting total real-world cost.

Stress-test exemptions and switches

Not every mortgage event is treated as a new mortgage with additional borrowing.

Since November 21, 2024, OSFI’s minimum-qualifying-rate requirement no longer applies to qualifying uninsured straight switches between federally regulated lenders where the borrower does not increase the loan amount or extend the remaining amortization. A lender may still review credit, property, payment history and its own underwriting requirements, and changes to the mortgage structure can remove the transaction from straight-switch treatment.

Insured transfers and insurer-related portability rules require separate analysis. The complete treatment belongs in the renewal and switch chapter.

Ratios are outputs, not explanations

When a borrower does not qualify, saying “the TDS is too high” is only the beginning.

The useful questions are:

Which input is driving the ratio?

Is the income being treated correctly?

Is a debt shown incorrectly?

Can a debt be repaid without depleting closing funds?

Is rental income being calculated under the most suitable permitted method?

Would a longer amortization be suitable?

Would a different property price solve the problem?

Is the proposed mortgage itself too large?

Does another lender have a legitimate policy difference?

The objective is not to manipulate the ratio. It is to understand the borrower’s complete financial position and choose a supportable structure.

Explore this subject further