← Back to Recently Funded

Recently Funded

Underwriting Case Study

Toronto Investment Property Purchased Under Holding Company with B-Lender Stated Income

Three friends pooled money to buy an investment property in Toronto. All three were self-employed. They earned decent money, but their income was not reflected strongly in their T1 Generals or corporate financials. They also had million-plus mortgages on their personal residences, which created additional debt-service pressure. They wanted to purchase the investment property under a holding company. Not all lenders allow purchases under a holding company, so lender selection was critical. We obtained approval from a B lender under a stated-income program supported by 12 months of bank statements, and the clients purchased the property under the holding company.

Details are anonymized to protect client, lender, investor, and transaction privacy. This case is for general education only and is not a commitment to lend, a guarantee of approval, or legal, tax, or financial advice.

1. Executive Summary

Three friends pooled money to buy an investment property in Toronto. All three were self-employed. They earned decent money, but their income was not reflected strongly in their T1 Generals or corporate financials. They also had million-plus mortgages on their personal residences, which created additional debt-service pressure. They wanted to purchase the investment property under a holding company. Not all lenders allow purchases under a holding company, so lender selection was critical. We obtained approval from a B lender under a stated-income program supported by 12 months of bank statements, and the clients purchased the property under the holding company.

2. Borrower Profile

The borrowers were three self-employed friends purchasing an investment property together in Toronto, Ontario. Their actual income was stronger than what appeared in their personal T1 Generals and corporate financials. Each borrower also had significant personal residence mortgage obligations, including million-plus mortgages. Borrower identities, businesses, income figures, credit scores, existing mortgage amounts, bank-statement deposits, and lender name are not disclosed.

3. Property Profile

The subject property was an investment property in Toronto, Ontario, purchased under a holding company. Exact address, property type details, purchase price, down payment, mortgage amount, loan-to-value, projected rent, rate, fees, and lender name are not disclosed.

4. The Challenge

The file had multiple layers of complexity. There were three borrowers, all self-employed. Their actual cash flow was stronger than what appeared on personal T1s and corporate financials. They already carried large mortgages on their personal residences, which created significant debt-service pressure. The property was being purchased as an investment, not a primary residence. The clients also wanted title under a holding company, which reduced lender options because many lenders do not allow or do not prefer holding-company purchases.

5. Why Conventional Solutions Failed

A traditional A-lender approval was difficult because the borrowers’ reported income did not support the requested mortgage strongly enough. Their personal T1 Generals and corporate financials did not reflect their actual cash flow, and they already carried large personal mortgage obligations. The holding-company ownership structure also reduced lender options because not all lenders permit purchases under a holding company. The file needed a B lender with both stated-income flexibility and holding-company acceptance.

6. Our Analysis

Our analysis focused on cash-flow reasonability and ownership-structure fit. The borrowers were not simple salaried applicants. Their real income had to be reviewed through bank statements, and their existing mortgages had to be factored into the overall risk profile. We also had to confirm which lenders would allow the property to be purchased under a holding company. The file was positioned for a B lender that could consider stated income supported by 12 months of bank statements and accept the holding-company structure.

7. Financing Structure

The file was structured as a B-lender investment-property purchase mortgage under a holding company. The stated-income support came from 12 months of bank statements. The lender reviewed the borrowers’ self-employed profile, existing personal mortgage liabilities, proposed property ownership, and overall reasonability. Public details do not disclose the lender name, mortgage amount, rate, term, amortization, fees, purchase price, down payment, rent amount, holding company name, or income calculation.

8. Why the Solution Worked

The solution worked because the lender’s policy matched the file. The borrowers had income, but it was not captured well through standard T1 and corporate-financial review. The B-lender stated-income program allowed the file to be evaluated using bank-statement evidence. The lender also accepted the holding-company purchase structure. The underwriting principle is that investment-property files involving corporations require both income flexibility and title-structure flexibility; one without the other may not be enough.

9. Key Lessons

  • Self-employed borrowers may earn good money even when T1 Generals and corporate financials show limited income.
  • Investment-property purchases become more complex when several borrowers already have large personal mortgages.
  • Not every lender allows a property to be purchased under a holding company.
  • Holding-company mortgage files require careful lender selection and documentation.
  • B-lender stated-income programs may work when 12 months of bank statements support the income story.
  • The ownership structure and the income structure must both fit the lender’s policy.
  • A file that fails under standard A-lender rules may still work with the right B-lender program.

10. Related HopeWell Resources

Related Guide

Related Service

Related Calculator

Related Mortgage Dictionary Terms

Related Funded Cases

Suggested Diagrams

  • Holding-company purchase structure diagram showing three individual investors, holding company, investment property, personal guarantees, and B-lender mortgage
  • Stated-income support diagram showing T1 income gap, corporate financials gap, 12 months bank statements, income reasonability, and B-lender approval
  • Investment-property underwriting diagram showing borrower income, existing personal mortgages, proposed rental property, holding-company structure, and lender policy fit
  • Lender eligibility decision tree showing A-lender decline, holding-company limitation, B-lender stated-income program, and final approval

Real-world experience

Related underwriting case studies

Explore anonymized Ontario mortgage files that show how borrower circumstances, property details, lender policy, costs, and exit strategy can interact.

View all case studies →
Recently FundedLondon

London Builder Purchase Closed with Rush Alternative Bridge and B-Lender Stated-Income Exit

London clients were purchasing their primary residence from a builder. The husband was a truck driver with very low verifiable income, and the wife was not working. Before approaching us, they had spent a lot of time trying to get an A-lender approval, but they were declined because the income did not support the requested mortgage. When they came to us, only about five days were left before closing. The builder was demanding a very high penalty for extending the closing, even by a few days. We arranged a rush mortgage from an alternative lender strictly as a six-month bridge. We then arranged a mortgage from a B lender under a stated-income program supported by 12 months of bank statements.

Solution
Alternative lender bridge and B-lender stated-income mortgage
Purpose
Rush builder purchase closing using alternative-lender bridge followed by B-lender stated-income exit
London Ontariobuilder purchaserush closing
Read the case study
Recently FundedToronto

Toronto IT Contractor Approved with Insured Stated-Income A-Lender Mortgage

An IT professional in Toronto was buying his primary residence. He earned decent income, but he worked through a corporation as a subcontractor, so lenders treated the file as self-employed. Because he wrote off a significant portion of income, the average of two years of T1 income was not sufficient for standard debt-service ratios. His bank declined the mortgage, and other brokers told him to arrange at least 20% down payment to qualify with a B lender. We recommended an insured stated-income mortgage from an A-side lender. The file was approved without requiring the client to increase the down payment to 20%.

Solution
Insured stated-income A-lender mortgage
Purpose
Primary residence purchase
Toronto OntarioIT contractorself-employed mortgage
Read the case study
Recently FundedKitchener

Kitchener Young Courier Company Owner Approved with B-Lender Stated Income

A very young single applicant in Kitchener had taken over his father’s courier company. His father transferred the company to him and moved back home around a year and a half earlier. The challenge was that the applicant had never had a job before, so this was his first real work experience. He had only about one and a half years of self-employment history. Usually, where a self-employed borrower has less than two years of history, lenders may consider an exception if the borrower has prior work experience in the same or a related industry. This applicant did not have that. His credit history was also very thin, with only a mobile phone provider showing on the bureau. He was putting 25% down. We reviewed his business bank statements and found strong cash flow. We approached a B lender and requested an exception to the two-year self-employment rule. The lender considered the file under its stated-income program based on 12 months of business bank statements and approved the mortgage.

Solution
B-lender stated-income purchase mortgage
Purpose
Home purchase
Kitchener Ontarioyoung borrowersingle applicant
Read the case study
Recently FundedMarkham

Markham Self-Employed Trucker Approved with B-Lender Stated-Income Exception

A self-employed truck driver in Markham had incorporated only about one year earlier. Many lenders require at least two years of self-employment history, so the file was not suitable for an A-lender approval. However, before incorporating, the client had worked as a truck driver on payroll. We approached a B lender and requested an exception to the two-year self-employment rule. The rationale was that the client had not entered a new industry; he had moved from payroll trucking employment into incorporated trucking work. We supported the file with previous employer T4s and 12 months of business bank statements, and the lender reviewed the income under a stated-income approach.

Solution
B-lender stated-income mortgage
Purpose
Residential mortgage financing
Markham Ontarioself-employed truckertruck driver mortgage
Read the case study
Recently FundedHamilton

Hamilton Purchase Approved with 100% Foreign Income and Dubai Sale Proceeds Down Payment

Hamilton clients were purchasing their primary residence in Canada. The husband worked as a commercial pilot for a major international airline and lived in Dubai, while the wife lived in Canada and was not working. The two major underwriting issues were that 100% of the income was foreign income and 100% of the down payment was coming from the sale of a property in Dubai. The clients wanted 80% LTV. Most A lenders were only comfortable up to approximately 65% LTV for this type of file. We approached almost every A lender in the broker network to request an exception for 80% LTV. The next practical option was a B lender. The B lender considered the foreign income through the husband’s job letter, pay stubs, and three months of bank statements showing salary deposits. For down payment, we submitted the Dubai sale deed, copy of bank draft, and bank statement showing deposit of the sale proceeds.

Solution
B-lender purchase mortgage
Purpose
Purchase mortgage using foreign income and Dubai property sale proceeds
Hamilton Ontariopurchase mortgageB-lender approval
Read the case study
Recently FundedToronto

Toronto B-Lender Second-Position HELOC Used for Daughter’s Tuition

Toronto clients approached us to access equity in their home because they needed money to finance their daughter’s tuition. Both clients were salaried. We reviewed the options and recommended a HELOC in second position from the B side. A full refinance was not recommended because the penalty to break the existing mortgage was high and their first mortgage was at a very low rate. A private mortgage would have been too costly for this purpose. The B-lender second-position HELOC gave them access to the funds while preserving the existing first mortgage.

Solution
B-lender second-position HELOC
Purpose
B-lender second-position HELOC for tuition funding
Toronto OntarioB-lender HELOCsecond-position HELOC
Read the case study